Musical bedfellows
May 12, 2008 - 9:43 pm — David RollandMore fun and games at City Council tonight.
The issue was contract negotiations between the Mayor’s office and three employee unions: the Municipal Employees Union (MEA, the white collars), Local 127 (the blue collars) and the Deputy City Attorneys Association. There was a dispute between the unions and the Mayor’s office on how the parties would proceed in the case of a negotiations impasse and, it seems, whether there was an impasse in the first place. I’m not completely clear on the ins, the outs and the what-have-yous, but the unions were alleging that Mayor Jerry Sanders changed the rules of the game mid-stream and attempted to impose a different contract than the unions were expecting, although it seems the most recent imposition included concessions on a new employee pension system.
What’s interesting in all this is who sided with whom.
City Attorney Mike Aguirre, who’s been at odds with Sanders and his people for nearly two years now, backed Sanders, going so far as to commend him for doing the right thing for the city of San Diego. Aguirre said it was within Sanders’ authority to impose the contract he was trying to impose. Councilmember Jim Madaffer, who can’t stand Aguirre, made the motion on the mayor’s contract offer, and after the vote, Aguirre approached Madaffer and shook his hand. The council’s three Republicans (Madaffer, Kevin Faulconer and Brian Maienschein) voted for the offer, along with Democrat Donna Frye, who for the last couple of years has taken a hard line on the union pay raises.
Council President Scott Peters, who has won the local Labor Council’s endorsement in his bid for city attorney, voted against the mayor’s offer, agreeing with the unions’ claim that the rules had been changed inappropriately. He was joined by Democrats Ben Hueso (who made some remarks in support of the blue-collar workers), Tony Young and Toni Atkins. As Peters was trying to state his position, Aguirre chimed in that Peters was acting solely on political ground, and Peters turned Aguirre’s microphone off.
So, the vote ended in a 4-4 tie, and so Sanders’ last offer failed to pass. That means, I think, that the parties will head back to the table. Unless Aguirre and Sanders hold hands and refuse to take a seat.
To sum up: Frye and the unions—farther apart. Aguirre and the unions—farther apart. Aguirre and Peters—farther apart. Frye and Sanders—closer together. Aguirre and Sanders—closer together. Aguirre and Madaffer—closer together. Peters and the unions—closer together. Peters and Sanders—trouble in paradise? It’ll be interesting to watch if Peters somehow wins the city attorney race and is faced with having to support or battle the unions in future disputes with Sanders, should he fend off Steve Francis’ bizarre challenge.

