Swine flu, a tragic boon?

Well,  I wouldn’t exactly describes today’s U-T’s editorial decisions as unethical, but they’re certainly insensitive. Check out this juxtaposition:

TOP OF THE FOLD, A1

Headline: “Local swine flu cases end in sorrow survival

Subhed: “Families of Patients urge people to get vaccination”

The story follows two pregnant women who contracted H1N1. One lived, the other died a week and a half after delivering her baby. Very sad.

“Some health officials have blamed the vaccine shortage on manufacturing delays involving the growth of H1N1 bacteria cultures in chicken eggs. This standard way of producing flu vaccine is widely seen as antiquated, but no better method has been adopted.”

CENTERPIERCE, C1, BUSINESS

Headline: “Carlsbad CEO excels in biotech tool field

Inside subhed: H1N1 outbreak brought firm more business.

An interview with Gregory Lucier, CEO of Invitrogen

Q: The H1N1 pandemic has been significant for you…How big of an area is that for the company?

A: It’s been quite a boon for us here in 2009…we have been inundated with orders from the CDC and other public health agencies around the world to buy our equipment, to buy our consumables, do the surveillance on what’s going on with H1N1, the epidemiology. And it really is the de facto standard for H1N1 testing.

So, what we have on the front page is a heartbreaking story of the victims of poor health technology. Then, inside, a blowjob piece for biotech mogul #208, who sees swine flu as a “boon.”

Now, to be fair, it doesn’t look like Invitrogen manufactures H1N1 vaccines, but then again, its web site isn’t exactly clear what its H1N1 involvement is.  Search for it, you get no results.

New private prison in San Diego County in 2010?

facility_SanDiegoCorrectionalIn its latest U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing, private-prison operator Corrections Corporation of America reports that it could begin construction on a new prison in Otay Mesa “as early as 2010.”

Here’s why: CCA currently operates the San Diego Correctional Facility, an 1,154-bed detention center housing ICE and US Marshals’ inmates, under a lease with San Diego County. The county has the right to purchase 950 of those beds at the end of 2011. Otherwise, those beds revert to county control on Dec. 31, 2015.

The remaining beds revert to county control on Dec 31., 2011 or earlier if the county gives CCA 270 days notice.

In a story published in August, the San Diego Daily Transcript reported CCA already had one potential site in its pocket:  “a major use permit is in place for a 40-acre lot purchased by CCA in east Otay Mesa.”

Back then, CCA had yet to proposed a construction time line, though Brag Wiggins, senior director of site acquisition for CCA, told SDDT the corporation was formulating a “game plan.”

Now it looks like 2010, however, CCA warned its investors, “[W]e can provide no assurance that we will be able to retain these inmate populations.”

In a statement emailed to CityBeat, CCA spokesman Steve Owen wrote:

CCA has a long-term contract to provide detention capacity and services to our government partner, ICE. As reported in the public filing…we are preparing for the option of having to replace the existing capacity we currently provide to ICE at Otay Mesa, based on the current contractual (i.e. lease) agreements with San Diego County. A portion of the facility has already reverted back to the County and is managed by them for their use separately and securely from the rest of the facility. CCA has made no additional announcements about construction (location, etc)…Our efforts in this matter are ongoing.

San Diego County has not returned calls regarding its plans for the prison leases, but those beds are no doubt being considered. As CityBeat Editor Dave Rolland reported, in August, San Diego Sheriff’s Commander John Ingrassia was floating the idea of using the CCA beds to alleviate current overpopulation (113 percent in August) and to handle a potential flood of released state inmates who re-offend.

No police investigation into Halloween brawl

brawlF’real, if you haven’t watched this yet, it’s rad.

Just heard from San Diego Police Department: The cops got a call at about 1:30 a.m. on Nov. 1 from 379 Fourth Ave. The caller reported a fight involving 20+ people, which reflects the video. The first officer arrived on the scene three minutes later and everyone scattered. A few were injured—including one guy with a nasty scrape on his head—and an ambulance was called. However, no one, not even the bystander whose rear windshield was smashed, wanted to file a criminal complaint.

And without a criminal complaint, SDPD says there can be no criminal investigation.

National organization backs up Southwestern College teachers; professors allowed to return

SWC

Three professors who were barred from Southwestern College in response to their involvement in protests against budget cuts have been allowed to return to campus today.

This follows a small explosion of nation attention, which started yesterday when  Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) slammed SWC…on Huffington Post. Here’s what FIRE President Greg Lukianoff posted:

If speaking your mind about issues facing the college where you teach–or even just joining a group of students doing the same–sounds to you like a reasonable thing for a professor to do, then you might want to stay away from Southwestern College in California.

That’s the best conclusion I can draw regarding the situation at Southwestern College (SWC), which has banned three professors from campus and denied them the use of campus e-mail and other resources after they did nothing more than join a group of students who was peacefully protesting against recent budget cutbacks at the college.

FIRE also sent a letter to SWC Superintendent-President Raj Chopra condemning the school’s  suspension of the faculty members and the criminal charges filed against them . (KGTV-10 reported on this Wednesday night, claiming its reporter “obtained” the letter, which usually means someone leaked it. Noooo…it was publicly available on FIRE’s website.)

SWC has unconstitutionally suspended three professors who did nothing more than join a group of students who peacefully protested SWC decisions and requested an audience with you. FIRE is also concerned about reports that the campus police have been used to intimidate faculty members and students and that students are being declared guilty of offenses for exercising their constitutional rights at SWC. Finally, FIRE has determined that SWC maintains and enforces an unconstitutional “free speech zone” policy restricting freedom of expression. SWC’s policies and actions have chilled and restricted freedom of expression, making a mockery of students’ and faculty members’ constitutional guarantees of free speech and free association—rights that SWC, as a public institution, is bound by the First Amendment to protect.

The national organization outlined a long list of legal precedents to back up its claims.

Faculty and students are throwing another protest at 11:30am today following the Southwestern College Education Association’s membership meeting. Here are the details:

Please meet on the corner of H Street and Otay Lakes Road after the SCEA meeting (around 11:30 AM). Feel free to bring posters that address one of the areas listed above. We will be wearing our yellow shirts, so be sure to get yours before they are all gone. Any leftover shirts will be available at the rally.

The suspended faculty will be the “special guests” and the SCEA’s 11am meeting.

Halloween costume brawl

UPDATE: As you can see, YouTube has removed the video due to “violations of terms of service.” Here’s a new version (Unfortunately, we can’t embed it):

brawl

Live Link: Halloween brawl.

Yeah. Um. Yeah. Purportedly shot in San Diego. Anyone recognize the location?

…In other confrontation-on-video news, San Diego Police were actually quite gentle with the protesters they arrested at Blue Shield:

In economic news…nerds, athletes and bankrupt small businesses

Image.ashxJust a few economic notes that jumped out at me this morning from PRNewswire:

  • First off, Equifax Inc just ranked the San Diego-Carlsbad region as the FOURTH top city for small business bankruptcy. Equifax didn’t provide a number, but it did say that bankruptcies were up 4 percent this quarter.
  • Meanwhile, Chargers players are still raking in the dough. Defensive end Steve Gregory—whose contract is worth an estimated $1.8 million—is now shilling for his CPA. “Young athletes often aren’t prepared for managing and budgeting their high salaries. They’re thrown into this. It’s important to have financial advisors you can trust,” Gregory says, touting his relationship with Merryl Lynch, Bank of America and Piascik & Associates.
  • Finally,  nerd-corp Wizards of the Coast, the guys behind Magic: The Gathering, have partnered again with San Diego-based Sony Online Entertainment to release a new ” online, 3D turn-based strategy game played within the rich Magic: The Gathering Multiverse.” Yes, they said “multiverse” in a press release. Score one for San Diego’s dork economy.

Balloon bass? Yes. Balloon bass.

This guy’s performing at MCASD’s “Return of TNT” on Nov. 5:

If it’s weed, it leads

weed“Storefronts selling Valium and Vicodin—some of the drugs most abused by adolescents—are springing up across San Diego County, often within the vicinity of schools and other places kids congregate. Parents tell Channel 7 the prevalence of Walgreens, Vons and Rite Aids in San Diego sends the wrong message to children…”

OK, you’d never, ever see this report on television news, but why not? That’s the tack Channel 7’s Mari Payton took in her medical cannabis “investigation” on last night’s 11 p.m. newscast. The sensationalized top story, “Where’s the Weed?” was heavily promoted during commercial breaks and it’s currently splashed, with an image of a youth puffing on a joint, across the front page of the NBC affiliate’s web site.  The piece transposes images of cash and weed with images those shock! bending images of school signs and kids on campus.

Payton makes the argument that parents should be up in arms about how many dispensaries have popped up in San Diego County and how that encourages teen drug use. (Does it also encourage kids to get leukemia? After all these are medical facilities) Then she makes a big hoo-ha about how Green Earth Herbal Collective’s proprietor recommends the plant as a remedy for anxiety disorders. As if experimenting with SSRI cocktails isn’t just as irresponsible.

But those aren’t Schedule 1 narcotics. That’s the justification for the double standard. The data, though, indicates that when it comes to teen drug abuse,  it doesn’t matter whether the drug’s illegal or not.

According to a 2008 report by the White House’s Office of National Drug Policy, prescriptions were the second most abused drug by teenagers after marijuana: 3 percent of 12 to 17 years olds abused pharmaceuticals compared to 7 percent for marijuana. In addition, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health reported that 70 percent of stimulant-abusing teens also abused marijuana.

OK, I’ll concede that perhaps these dispensaries shouldn’t be near schools as liquor shops are generally not. What Payton misses—unforgivable for a journalist—is Thursday’s big news that San Diego’s dispensaries, under the umbrella of Southern California NORML, have offered up a draft city ordinance for regulating themselves. As CityBeat reported, the dispensaries are ready to agree to a rule that would prohibit operations within 500 feet of a school. SoCal NORML director Craig Beresh says there’s a lot of wiggle room, which presumably would include increasing that distance.

Beresh wasn’t interviewed and the Thursday afternoon press conference wasn’t included in the piece. Instead, Green Earth was the only pro-medipot source used to balance out opposition interviews with the District Attorney’s Office, law enforcement and upset parents.

Payton should learn to Google.

A few semi-related notes:

- A warning to Green Earth and other dispensaries who agree to grant access to television crews: First of all, you might get burned by the reporter. Secondly, according to at least two search-warrant affidavits filed in San Diego Superior Court,  dispensaries came to the attention of law enforcement  from television reports.

- Hillcrest Compassion Care, one of the dispensaries raided in September, is still advertising on cable TV. I saw the spot last night.

- Steve Breen had a poignant cartoon in Thursday’s U-T contrasting the willingness of medical cannabis providers to treat any condition with pot against the health insurance industry’s willingness to reject coverage for any condition.

Yet another guitar seller suit

I’m getting tired of shelling out the $2.40 for these filings, so I’ll just tell you about it.

Joshua Spencer Seiler and David Kauffman have filed the fourth lawsuit in US District Court in San Diego against Guitar Center and the National Association of Music Merchants. This time, the suit also names Fender and Yamaha as defendants.

Gay tortoise love at San Diego Zoo!

This just posted to YouTube: Two male tortoises get their groove on, at least according to the user who posted this video.

Two male Galapagos tortoises at the San Diego Zoo the week after breeding season. In all fairness, the one on top is blind. Interesting to say the least! Make sure and listen with the volume up!

SoCal NORML offers up dispensary ordinance

730px-Bubba_KushCraig Beresh, director of the Southern California branch of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, just popped by the office to drop off a copy of a draft ordinance for the regulation of cannabis dispensaries in San Diego.

Beresh says that he personally forced it into Mayor Jerry Sanders’ hands at a coffee shop this morning. SoCal NORML will be officially announcing the ordinance at a press conference this afternoon.

Some highlights:

- The city’s Planning Commission would issue “Dispensary Use Permits.” The dispensaries would pay fees for the permits.

- Hours of operation would be limited to 9 a.m. to 9 p.m.

- Dispensaries must be located in a “visible store-front type location which provides public views of the dispensary entrance, its windows and the entrance to the dispensary premises from a public street.” The ordinance says the reason for this is so that law enforcement can see into the dispensary and visit the non-cannabis area.

- Dispensaries would not be allowed within 500 feet of a school, church, or “special needs facility,” including Housing Authority projects where residents with drug abuse histories are in recovery. Dispensaries would not be allowed within 500 feet of each other or on any parcel zoned for residential use.

- Anyone involved in a violent hate crime would not be allowed to work in a dispensary.

- The dispensary would have to post “No Loitering” signs. Signs barring the consumption of marijuana would also be posted. Restrooms would remain locked.

- Dispensaries would need to verify recommendations with the physician’s office. Dispensaries would not be allowed to have an on-site physician to provide recommendations.

- Patients or primary caregivers would be limited to one ounce of dried marijuana per visit.

- Patients would not be allowed consume marijuana on the premises.

- Dispensaries would be allowed to engage in the commercial sale of paraphernalia, as long as they have the required licenses and permits and don’t display them in public areas.

- The dispensaries must have a waiting area and a separate and secure dispensing area for patients and caregivers.

- The dispensaries must have a security plan approved by the San Diego Police Department. Dispensaries must have vaults or safes for storing pot with an alert system that would result in police arriving within 15 minutes after being alerted by an alarm company. Security camera must be installed to montior the entrance and exterior of the premises.

- The dispensary must provide all neighbors within 100 feet with the name, cell phone and fax number for an “on-site community relations staff person.”

- Dispensaries should meet with police, city personnel, businesses within two blocks and neighborhood groups every quarter.

- Dispensary staff must receive training by a City Council-approved attorney.

- Dispensaries must clean up all graffiti on the premises and in the parking lot within 72 hours of it turning up.

- Dispensaries would be subject to an annual audit by the city.

Another Guitar Center lawsuit

RGA321SPB

In this week’s CityBeat, I reported on two lawsuits filed in US District Court in San Diego against Guitar Center and the National Association of Music Merchants.

Today, a third class-action lawsuit has been filed by Robert Lesko of Modesto, Calif., Suzanne Ondre of San Francisco and Lisa Pritchett of San Mateo, Calif., making the same price-fixing and collusion allegations regarding “minimum advertised pricing.”

According to the complaint, Lesko bought a Marshall amp, a guitar stand, a Gibson guitar with case, a strap and strap locks, a Fender amp, an Ovation guitar with case, strings and a Musicman bass guitar and case. Ondre bought a Takamine guitar and amp, while Pritchett bought an Ibanez guitar, strap and stand.

Here are the pdfs of each of the suits.

Sepulveda vs. Guitar Center, NAMM

Bohl vs. Guitar Center, NAMM

Lesko vs. Guitar Center, NAMM