Comments on: Today in Journalism: Vagina dentata intellectuallis

By: Justin Roberts

Justin Roberts — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:21:42 +0000

I’m no referee, but I think the one-two punch inflicted by Ricardo and Aaryn resulted in a TKO—Tonight’s winner: CityBeat!

By: aaryn b.

aaryn b. — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:22:32 +0000

No! Don’t go fixing all your grammatical flubs, Cat Dirt! If you do that, we might have to assign an ounce of credibility to your arrogant, know-it-all comments on this blog. Stay as you are, Kitty Litter: Confuse “then” with “than” and create all the complicated compound words you want. I like you—or rather, I like to dislike you—that way. A lot.

By: Ricardo

Ricardo — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:13:32 +0000

Cat Dirt: You need to take an English Class! I’ve never read someone who takes himself so seriously in print, albiet virtual, with such horrible grammar. It’s a miracle that you passed Jr. Highschool.

Here’s what (I think) you should have written: Sorry, maybe I’m slow, but I don’t get the gravamen of this post; the first book review is “bad,” in terms of the writing, and the second is “good?” Is that the point?

I just looked at CatDirtSez.Blogspot.org and you wrote this:

Analysis:
Live Nation can hide the ball if it want’s too, but we all now that is equvialent to admitting total, utter failure.
If it want’s too? We all now?

Not to mention how you combine alot into a compound word. It’s a lot (two words). Get it right.

Maybe it’s just an editing issue, but you may consider repeating the fourth grade before posting any more of your Neanderthalithic rants, especially if you are writing book reviews and such.

By: cat dirt

cat dirt — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:11:20 +0000

sorry maybe im slow but i don’t get the gravamen of this post. so the first book review is “bad” in terms of the writing and the second is “good”? is that the point?