<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A real world Mr. Fusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/01/11/a-real-world-mr-fusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/01/11/a-real-world-mr-fusion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Wolff</title>
		<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/01/11/a-real-world-mr-fusion/#comment-13100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Wolff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/01/11/a-real-world-mr-fusion/#comment-13100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Popular Science article, they say the first commercial version will... well, how about I just quote: &quot;Every hour, the first commercial version will turn 10 tons of auto waste—tires, plastic, vinyl—into enough natural gas to produce 17 million BTUs of energy (it will use 956,000 of those BTUs to keep itself running). &quot;

That&#039;s pretty efficient, even if it is mostly theoretical. I still await real world results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Popular Science article, they say the first commercial version will&#8230; well, how about I just quote: &#8220;Every hour, the first commercial version will turn 10 tons of auto waste—tires, plastic, vinyl—into enough natural gas to produce 17 million BTUs of energy (it will use 956,000 of those BTUs to keep itself running). &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty efficient, even if it is mostly theoretical. I still await real world results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatPau</title>
		<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/01/11/a-real-world-mr-fusion/#comment-13053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MatPau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/01/11/a-real-world-mr-fusion/#comment-13053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interesting concept, and from what i know about physics and chemistry, it&#039;s theoretically possible without too many nasty side effects. My only question is how efficient is this process? i noticed his link didn&#039;t say how much energy it takes to run his machine; 1.2 gallons of oil may be produced, but it may take the equivalent of 3 gallons of oil to even turn the machine on!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting concept, and from what i know about physics and chemistry, it&#8217;s theoretically possible without too many nasty side effects. My only question is how efficient is this process? i noticed his link didn&#8217;t say how much energy it takes to run his machine; 1.2 gallons of oil may be produced, but it may take the equivalent of 3 gallons of oil to even turn the machine on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

