<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aguirre&#8217;s not kidding about the booze ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/07/03/aguirres-not-kidding-about-the-booze-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/07/03/aguirres-not-kidding-about-the-booze-ban/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slag</title>
		<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/07/03/aguirres-not-kidding-about-the-booze-ban/#comment-14477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcitybeat.wordpress.com/?p=2006#comment-14477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[of course the water issue was done on purpose. rich folk have boats. no one intend to make them uncomfortable with this ban. 

faulkner sucks. I can&#039;t wait to see who can step up and challenge this false republican.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course the water issue was done on purpose. rich folk have boats. no one intend to make them uncomfortable with this ban. </p>
<p>faulkner sucks. I can&#8217;t wait to see who can step up and challenge this false republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDVOTER</title>
		<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/07/03/aguirres-not-kidding-about-the-booze-ban/#comment-14464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SDVOTER]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcitybeat.wordpress.com/?p=2006#comment-14464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Promising prosecution with no facts and ordering arrests? I hope the police have the sense to understand who gets sued first. 4th of July, Constitution, what are we missing here? Feds will have to hire outside counsel to help]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Promising prosecution with no facts and ordering arrests? I hope the police have the sense to understand who gets sued first. 4th of July, Constitution, what are we missing here? Feds will have to hire outside counsel to help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Miller</title>
		<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/07/03/aguirres-not-kidding-about-the-booze-ban/#comment-14459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcitybeat.wordpress.com/?p=2006#comment-14459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is the duty of the legislature to make laws that are clear in their meaning, so that individuals may know when they are or will be in violation of such law.  Where a criminal law is &quot;vague and indefinite&quot;, prosecution and conviction under such law is unconstitutional.  If the booze ban prohibits drinking on the &quot;beach&quot;, rather than drinking on the &quot;beach and in the water adjacent to the beach&quot;, the law is not clear and definite with respect to drinking in the water.  In fact, one may argue that the exclusion of drinking in the water was intentional to permit drinking on boats and other pleasure craft.  Thus, any citation, prosecution, or conviction of an individual for drinking in the water would violate the &quot;due process clause&quot; of both the state and federal constitutions, because it fails to give adequate notice that the act of drinking in the water is illegal.  Mr. Aguirre should know this as all 2nd year law students are taught it.  Additionally, by encouraging police/lifeguards to cite and/or arrest individuals for behavior, which is not prohibited by the law, Mr. Aguirre is violating the ethical obligations of a prosecutor and setting the city up for another losing lawsuit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the duty of the legislature to make laws that are clear in their meaning, so that individuals may know when they are or will be in violation of such law.  Where a criminal law is &#8220;vague and indefinite&#8221;, prosecution and conviction under such law is unconstitutional.  If the booze ban prohibits drinking on the &#8220;beach&#8221;, rather than drinking on the &#8220;beach and in the water adjacent to the beach&#8221;, the law is not clear and definite with respect to drinking in the water.  In fact, one may argue that the exclusion of drinking in the water was intentional to permit drinking on boats and other pleasure craft.  Thus, any citation, prosecution, or conviction of an individual for drinking in the water would violate the &#8220;due process clause&#8221; of both the state and federal constitutions, because it fails to give adequate notice that the act of drinking in the water is illegal.  Mr. Aguirre should know this as all 2nd year law students are taught it.  Additionally, by encouraging police/lifeguards to cite and/or arrest individuals for behavior, which is not prohibited by the law, Mr. Aguirre is violating the ethical obligations of a prosecutor and setting the city up for another losing lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDVOTER</title>
		<link>http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/07/03/aguirres-not-kidding-about-the-booze-ban/#comment-14458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SDVOTER]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcitybeat.wordpress.com/?p=2006#comment-14458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the fishing boats at the point loma and la jolla kelp beds will be subject to the ban. The harbor cruise. USS Midway, (his personal eye sore) shut down for the day. I think there is a law that says to prosecute you must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt the person is guilty. then you may file charges and bring it to a jury. or you can take the Agurrie method &#039;sue until you break them&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the fishing boats at the point loma and la jolla kelp beds will be subject to the ban. The harbor cruise. USS Midway, (his personal eye sore) shut down for the day. I think there is a law that says to prosecute you must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt the person is guilty. then you may file charges and bring it to a jury. or you can take the Agurrie method &#8216;sue until you break them&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

