Who was president at 12:01 yesterday?
Anyone watching CBS during yesterday’s inauguration heard Katie Couric declare Joseph Biden President, at least for the few minutes between noon and 12:05. President Bush’s term had ended, per the Constitution, at noon yesterday. Biden had been sworn in at 12:01. Then Yo Yo Ma, Itzhak Perlman, et. al. played It’s a gift to be simple, and then at 12:05, Obama was sworn in. The Constitution also says that the president cannot use his executive powers before swearing the oath. So, who was president from 12:00 – 12:01? And was Biden president from 12:05?
Law blogs to the rescue!
From PrawfsBlawg:
The prevailing view seems to be that he became President under the Twentieth Amendment at noon and had to take the oath before he could “enter on the execution” of his office–in other words, before he could wield any executive power. And I think I agree with that, otherwise this all becomes unnecessarily complex.
So that seems to ice the question. But Kenneth Katkin, from Northern Kentucky University, decides to consider what happens when this becomes “unnecessarily complex”. Writing a post that even he admits was just for fun, he argues that in fact, the nation’s first black president was Condoleezza Rice. Details from the Washington City Paper’s City Desk blog after the jump.
(1) The 20th Amendment provides that “[t]he terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January. . . . ”
(2) Art II., Sec. 1 Cl. 8 provides that “[b]efore he enter on the Execution of his Office, [The President] shall take the following oath. . . ”
(3) President Obama did not take the Oath of Office until about 12:03 pm today, after Vice President Biden took it at about 12:01 p.m. (Yo Yo Ma and Itzhak Perlman were still fiddling at noon).
(4) Therefore, there was a brief window (just after noon) when George Bush and Dick Cheney were no longer President and Vice President, but Barack Obama and Joe Biden also were not yet qualified to enter on the Execution of their offices.
(5) The Presidential Succession Act, 3 U.S.C. sec. 19(a)(1), provides: “If, by reason of . . . failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President.” Section 19(b) states that the President Pro Tempore of the Senate shall act as President (under the same terms and conditions) if the Speaker of the House fails to qualify.
(6) Neither Nancy Pelosi nor Robert Byrd actually resigned their seats in the Congress. Thus, neither of them qualified to become Acting President under the Presidential Succession Act. Plus, interbranch appointments might be unconstitutional anyhow. See Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar, Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional?, 48 Stan. L. Rev. 113 (1995); but see Howard Wasserman, Structural Principles and Presidential Succession, 90 Ky. L.J. 345 (2002).
(7) Section 19(d)(1) of the Presidential Succession Act provides: “If, by reason of . . . failure to qualify, there is no President pro tempore to act as President under subsection (b) of this section, then the officer of the United States who is highest on the following list, and who is not under disability to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President shall act as President: Secretary of State . . . ”
(8) Notably, Section 19(d)(1) does not condition the Secretary of State’s assumption of the powers and duties of the office of President on resignation of her current office, nor does elevation of the Secretary of State raise any constitutional issue of interbranch appointment.
(9) The term of office of the Secretary of State does not automatically terminate at noon on the 20th day of January.
(10) On January 20, 2009, Condoleeza Rice was (and is) still the Secretary of State.
(11) Accordingly, from 12:00 noon until 12:01 p.m. (when Vice President Biden took the oath of office and became Vice President), Condoleeza Rice was momentarily the Acting President of the United States, our first African-American President.
I suppose the obvious counterargument is that Secretary Rice *also* never took the Oath prescribed in Art. II, Sec. 1, cl. 8, and thus was no more qualified than Barack Obama or Joe Biden to act as President at 12:00 noon. But if Secretary Rice was not President from noon to 12:01, then who was?








It appears that they purposely misquoted the 20th amendment which ends with “…and the terms of their successors shall then begin.”
So the entire 20th amendment says “The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January,… and the terms of their successors shall then begin.”
So based on the US Constitution, as soon as the terms end the successors begins. There is no gap.
The actual text of the 20th amendment can be found at:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxx.html
And, wasn’t Robert Gates named the successor just in case on January 20, 2009?
@ Jim: the key to the argument is the oath of office. Without taking the oath, Obama may technically have not been allowed to execute the powers of his office. So the discussion is not nearly so simple as you describe.
@ ddc: Gates watched the inauguration off-site, but that does not make him the “named successor”. hye was off-=site just in case someone bombed the inauguration and the rest of government was dead. Gates is in the line of succession, so he would have become president in the event of a disaster. But since everyone was alive, the legal question remains interesting and entertaining.
Yes, but the oath is just ceremonial. The 20th Amendment Section 1 covers how presidential succession occurs.
That’s not correct. The oath is enshrined in Article II: “Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation”
The Prawfsblawg linked above considers the legal meaning of the oath, and it describes historical interpretations by different presidents of just what powers they had, if any, before having taken the oath.
For further evidence of the legal weight of the oath, consider that Obama retook the oath of office this morning, just to make sure he had taken it properly: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28780417/